News & Commentary
  • Home
  • About Us
  • About Unschooling
  • Our Magazine
    • Next Issue Preview
    • Feature Articles
    • Subscibe
    • Digital Login
    • Write For HEM
    • Advertise
  • Consultants
    • Teresa Brett
    • Leslie Potter
    • Pat Farenga
    • Dayna Martin
    • Michelle Barone
    • Blake Boles
    • Kevin C Neece
  • Good Stuff
    • Audio Interviews
    • Videos
    • Book Reviews
    • Product Reviews
    • Unschooling Blogs
    • Free Book Offer
    • Books We Like
  • Support
    • Consultants
    • Our Magazine
    • Our e-Newsletter
  • News
    • News & Commentary
    • State News
    • Federal News
    • International News
  • Contact Us
    • General Inquiry
    • Editor
    • Subscriptions
    • Apply to be a Product Reviewer
    • Advertising

Daytime Curfew-Homeschoolers Using Political Punch

Daytime curfew shines bright in Bedford elections Fort Worth Star-Telegram May 05, 2009
By DIANNA HUNT

Continuing controversy over the curfew has spilled into the campaigns for mayor and two City Council seats.

“It probably did bring some candidates out, initially, and for a couple of them, it’s probably still their main issue,” said Mayor Jim Story, who is running for re-election against political newcomer Kenneth Kimmons.

Says Kimmons: “It is an issue, and I think it’s an important one, but it’s not the only one.”

Accuse an opponent of a one issue candidacy and you could win points.  But I have seen activists become involved in one community issue, and then take note of how leaders operate in that and other issues at council meetings.  It’s a learning experience waiting for your turn and your issue at City Council meetings.  Sometimes it leads you to try making a positive difference by running for office.

From the S-T article:

The council approved an ordinance in September that prohibits people under 17, with a few exceptions, from being in a public place between 9 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. on school days. Violators and their parents can be fined up to $500. Businesses are required to alert officials if a youth is on their property during those hours.

The measure has drawn opposition from home-schooling families and civil libertarians, who say the measure erodes personal freedom and forces students, parents and businesses to go to court to prove their innocence. Supporters say the ordinance is having the desired effect of reducing truancy and daytime crime.

Mayor Story said that his leadership “accommodated home-schoolers in the ordinance“.  But it appears that Bedford businesses and families (not on the 9-2:30 education schedule) have to continuously respond to authorities if kids go out and about during Bedford school district hours.  The public front doesn’t appear to be a  business or family friendly community, if anyone asked me.

One City Council candidate, Jason McCaffity, ( a police sergeant)  said they should get rid of the daytime curfew.

“This is just another senseless or needless law that is on the books,” he said. “It doesn’t actually address truancy — it makes it illegal for children to be in public in the daytime.”

There are no useful “exemptions” to daytime curfew when you are guilty until proven innocent.

Home Education Magazine January-February 1997

Truancy, Curfews and Our Response- Janie Levine Hellyer

In July, 1996, the U.S. Department of Education in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Justice issued a “Manual to Combat Truancy.” The manual speaks of truancy as “the first sign of trouble,” and “a gateway to crime.” It encourages communities to involve parents, ensure that students face firm sanctions for truancy, create meaningful incentives for parental responsibility, establish ongoing truancy prevention programs in school, and involve local law enforcement in truancy reduction efforts. The manual then goes on to describe what it calls “successful models of new anti-truancy initiatives” in communities across the nation. Statistics are provided that hold up truancy prevention efforts beside crime reduction figures. Sources for funding, training and technical assistance to communities are offered. In response, communities across the country are setting in place ordinances and regulations. In early October, we asked families to tell us what they were seeing and how the new regulations were affecting their families and communities. [Continue reading the homeschoolers' observations of curfew regulations at the HEM site and within News-Commentary archives.]

Home Education Magazine March-April 1999

Taking Charge- Curfews and Homeschoolers
Larry and Susan Kaseman
As homeschoolers, we need to be informed about daytime curfews for several reasons.

* Although only a few communities have enacted curfews so far, the number is increasing.

* Curfews undermine everyone’s basic freedoms.

* Our efforts to oppose curfews are much more likely to be effective if we act now, before curfews are proposed in our community, or at least are prepared to act immediately if they are proposed in our community.

* We may be drawn into debates about how curfews can be made less inconvenient for homeschoolers. This shifts the focus away from the serious issues. There are no “good” curfews. [Continue reading at the site]

Tags: Bedford Texas, Curfews, David Gebhart, daytime curfew, Fort Worth Star-Telegram, Heart of Texas, Jason McCaffity, Jim Story, Kenneth Kimmons, Texas education, Texas Home School Coalition, Texas homeschool, Texas homeschooling, Weblogs

WSJ-More Cities Targeting Teens with Daytime Curfew

More Cities Target Teens With Daytime Curfews
Wall Street Journal By LESLIE EATON April 26, 2009

DALLAS — This city is considering joining a rising number of others across the country that are imposing criminal penalties on kids who skip school to hang out at the mall or on local street corners.

Such juvenile daytime curfews to combat truancy and crime are drawing protests from groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union and from the parents of homeschooled children who, along with some parents of public-school students, object on grounds that such laws in effect criminalize otherwise law-abiding kids who may have good reasons for not being in school.

Homeschoolers, kids who attend private schools on different schedules than the public schools are targets to be stopped.  Even public school kids within the same district who might be on year round schedules (or visa versa) will be detained with the assumption of guilt until proven innocent.

Daytime-curfew ordinances usually exempt children who can prove they are taught at home, but homeschooling parents say their kids are upset by repeated challenges from authorities when they shoot hoops in parks or ride their bikes while school is in session.

You’re not exempt if your freedom of movement in a public place is restricted by having to prove your homeschooling status.  Texan homeschoolers don’t register or report to school authorities.  But a walk to the library terminating in a ride back home in a police car  does not sound appealing for  homeschooled children.  From the WSJ:

About 120,000 families in Texas homeschool approximately 300,000 children, according to the Texas Home School Coalition, an advocacy group based in Lubbock that is fighting curfews.

Home-schooling families were prominent among the roughly 80 people at a city-council hearing Wednesday, and also organized a protest outside City Hall on Monday. Doreen Fisher, a Dallas mother who homeschools her two young children, said she is also concerned about the impact of fines on low-income families.

“I was raised poor,” she said. “I know if I had come home with a $500 fine because I skipped school to get a tan for the prom, it would have been catastrophic.”

In Elyria, Ohio, the school principal and police chief opposed the daytime curfew proposal.  Ohio’s Mary Nix posted on HEM Homeschool Support and Networking and here’s an excerpt from the Chronicle-Telegram in February of 2008:

The proposal is being taken up by the Council at the behest of Councilman Forrest L. Bullocks, D-2nd ward, who said he’s heard from several residents who were wondering why they see students wandering around during school hours. The Council’s Public Utilities, Safety and Environment Committee will hear the pros and cons — and that’s all it plans to do tonight, Councilman Kevin Brubaker, D-at large, said.

“I think we will have to look into what kind of benefit this would bring to the city,” Brubaker said. “Our Police Department handles enough keeping the city safe and shouldn’t have to deal with a matter that is best left up to the schools.”

Schools have truant officers and funding from taxpayers to chase down truant kids. Concerned taxpayers dislike the bureaucratic double dipping from the government to perform the same job.

I agree with Texan Doreen Fisher.  A $500 fine and/or putting the parent(s) in jail seems inappropriate when kids aren’t engaged enough within the school to stay in the school.

Who and what is causing the real failure here?

Elyria High School Principal Quinn shows accountability to her students and the community.  She knows a truant problem is her problem to take on.  I think Elyria is fortunate to have Diane Quinn in their schools:

“People must remember that if someone is skipping school, that’s the symptom of a bigger problem, not the problem,” she said. “If parents work with us, we can address attendance issues and correct behavior without the need for a daytime curfew.”

Posted by Susan Ryan

Tags: Dallas Texas, daytime curfew, Elyria High School, Texas Home School Coalition, Texas homeschooling, Wall Street Journal

Teenage drivers: Who are the best teachers?

The same old argument (with study citations from both sides) about how kids learn best was pointed out in the Arlington, TX Star-Telegram. This one was specifically about teenage drivers.

The article header is titled: Honoring those whose lessons last a lifetime (Posted on Sun, May. 06, 2007) And that headline was related to honoring teachers. Further down, the article morphed into a bit about teenage drivers and parents “brave enough” to teach their own and those “more comfortable paying someone else The same old argument (with study citations from both sides) about how kids learn best was pointed out in the Arlington, TX Star-Telegram. This one was specifically about teenage drivers.

The article header is titled: Honoring those whose lessons last a lifetime (Posted on Sun, May. 06, 2007) And that headline was related to honoring teachers. Further down, the article morphed into a bit about teenage drivers and parents “brave enough” to teach their own and those “more comfortable paying someone else for the privilege”. Question being asked:

So which is better for the teen?

A press release (Parent-Taught Drivers at Greater Risk for Crashes/Injuries) from the Texas Transportation Institute lists the criteria used to conduct the study.

The study was conducted by TTI (Texas Transportation Institute) for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and involved analysis of 1.4 million driver records, a mail survey of young drivers and nine focus groups of teen drivers, their parents and driver education instructors.

The study also includes the focus group questions. And the 10 page survey that was sent to 5,000 new Texas drivers who were “randomly selected” from almost 190,000 possible candidates, was also included in the appendices. I was impressed with the completeness of the citations by the TTI in the study. I’m just not so sure about the content of the questions and the intent of the study. And I wonder how many randomly selected Texas homeschoolers sent back this survey. Our family wouldn’t have returned it if the status quo worked in our state. And from what I understand, parent led driver’s education in Texas works or homeschoolers would have ditched it. That does seem to be our way, after all.

Homeschooling parents teaching driver’s education to their loved ones are also paying taxes for the driver’s education “experts” in the schools, and, very often are the providers of the automobiles and auto insurance for the new drivers. Seems logical to assume what the Texas Home School Coalition noted in the Star-Telegram article:

Members of that group point to research by Driver Ed in a Box, a company that sells instruction products, that says some parent-taught programs produce drivers who have a crash rate that is one-fifth the state average.

Provided below are the programs listed in the TTI study for use in Parent-Taught Driver Education in Texas (Pg. 180):

Program Course -103 is offered by Driver Ed in a Box and has been approved by the Department. In order to instruct from this course, an application for the Texas Parent Taught Driver Education Program is required. Course -103 has received approval from the Department for the use of an interactive CD ROM or their textbook “Driver Ed in a Box, The Textbook.” In addition, you must contact Driver Education Supplies and Training at 1-800-562-6405. There may be additional costs associated with this program. For additional information about this program go to

http://www.driveredinabox.com

Program Course -104 is offered by Curb Buster and has been approved by the Department. In order to instruct from this course, an application for the Texas Parent Taught Driver Education Program is required. Course -104 has received approval from the Department for the use of an interactive CD ROM or their textbook “Drive Right.” In addition, you must contact Curb Busters at 1-866-526-9484. There may be additional costs associated with this program. For additional information about this program go to

http://curbbuster.com

Program Course -105 is offered by Driver Ed at Home and has been approved by the Department. In order to instruct from this course, an application for the Texas Parent Taught Driver Education Program is required. Course -105 has received approval from the Department for the use of their textbook “Responsible Driving.” In addition, you must contact Driver Ed at Home at 1-713-227-4409. There may be additional costs associated with this program. For additional information about this program go to

http://www.driverslicensetraining.com

Program Course -106 is offered by Texas Driver and Traffic Safety Education Association and has been approved by the Department. In order to instruct from this course, an application for the Texas Parent Taught Driver Education Program is required. Course -106 has received approval from the Department for the use of their textbook “Texas Traffic Safety Education Student Manual.” In addition, you must contact Texas Driver and Traffic Safety Education Association at 1-936-435-8324. There may be additional costs associated with this program. For additional information about this program send an email to tgilbert@esc6.net

Program Course -107 is offered by Virtual Drive of Texas and has been approved by the Department. In order to instruct from this course, an application for the Texas Parent Taught Driver Education Program is required. Course -107 has received approval from the Department for the use of computer based training version provided on CD ROM “Virtual Drive of Texas.” In addition, you must contact Virtual Drive of Texas at 1-806570-6423. There may be additional costs associated with this program. For additional information about this program go to http://www.virtualdriveoftexas.com

Program Course -108 is offered by DriversEd.com and has been approved by the Department. In order to instruct from this course, an application for the Texas Parent Taught Driver Education Program is required. Course -108 has received approval from the Department for the use of an online computer based training version

Posted by Susan Ryan

for the privilege”. Question being asked:

So which is better for the teen?

A press release (Parent-Taught Drivers at Greater Risk for Crashes/Injuries) from the Texas Transportation Institute lists the criteria used to conduct the study.

The study was conducted by TTI (Texas Transportation Institute) for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and involved analysis of 1.4 million driver records, a mail survey of young drivers and nine focus groups of teen drivers, their parents and driver education instructors.

The study also includes the focus group questions. And the 10 page survey that was sent to 5,000 new Texas drivers who were “randomly selected” from almost 190,000 possible candidates, was also included in the appendices. I was impressed with the completeness of the citations by the TTI in the study. I’m just not so sure about the content of the questions and the intent of the study. And I wonder how many randomly selected Texas homeschoolers sent back this survey. Our family wouldn’t have returned it if the status quo worked in our state. And from what I understand, parent led driver’s education in Texas works or homeschoolers would have ditched it. That does seem to be our way, after all.

Homeschooling parents teaching driver’s education to their loved ones are also paying taxes for the driver’s education “experts” in the schools, and, very often are the providers of the automobiles and auto insurance for the new drivers. Seems logical to assume what the Texas Home School Coalition noted in the Star-Telegram article:

Members of that group point to research by Driver Ed in a Box, a company that sells instruction products, that says some parent-taught programs produce drivers who have a crash rate that is one-fifth the state average.

Provided below are the programs listed in the TTI study for use in Parent-Taught Driver Education in Texas (Pg. 180):

Program Course -103 is offered by Driver Ed in a Box ® and has been approved by the Department. In order to instruct from this course, an application for the Texas Parent Taught Driver Education Program is required. Course -103 has received approval from the Department for the use of an interactive CD ROM or their textbook “Driver Ed in a Box, The Textbook.” In addition, you must contact Driver Education Supplies and Training at 1-800-562-6405. There may be additional costs associated with this program. For additional information about this program go to

http://www.driveredinabox.com

Program Course -104 is offered by Curb Buster and has been approved by the Department. In order to instruct from this course, an application for the Texas Parent Taught Driver Education Program is required. Course -104 has received approval from the Department for the use of an interactive CD ROM or their textbook “Drive Right.” In addition, you must contact Curb Busters at 1-866-526-9484. There may be additional costs associated with this program. For additional information about this program go to

http://curbbuster.com

Program Course -105 is offered by Driver Ed at Home and has been approved by the Department. In order to instruct from this course, an application for the Texas Parent Taught Driver Education Program is required. Course -105 has received approval from the Department for the use of their textbook “Responsible Driving.” In addition, you must contact Driver Ed at Home at 1-713-227-4409. There may be additional costs associated with this program. For additional information about this program go to

http://www.driverslicensetraining.com

Program Course -106 is offered by Texas Driver and Traffic Safety Education Association and has been approved by the Department. In order to instruct from this course, an application for the Texas Parent Taught Driver Education Program is required. Course -106 has received approval from the Department for the use of their textbook “Texas Traffic Safety Education Student Manual.” In addition, you must contact Texas Driver and Traffic Safety Education Association at 1-936-435-8324. There may be additional costs associated with this program. For additional information about this program send an email to tgilbert@esc6.net

Program Course -107 is offered by Virtual Drive of Texas and has been approved by the Department. In order to instruct from this course, an application for the Texas Parent Taught Driver Education Program is required. Course -107 has received approval from the Department for the use of computer based training version provided on CD ROM “Virtual Drive of Texas.” In addition, you must contact Virtual Drive of Texas at 1-806570-6423. There may be additional costs associated with this program. For additional information about this program go to http://www.virtualdriveoftexas.com

Program Course -108 is offered by DriversEd.com and has been approved by the Department. In order to instruct from this course, an application for the Texas Parent Taught Driver Education Program is required. Course -108 has received approval from the Department for the use of an online computer based training version

Posted by Susan Ryan

Tags: Driver Education, Star-Telegram, Texas Home School Coalition, Texas Parent Taught Driver Education Program

Texas HB 1569

Via HEM-Networking:

Texas Home School Coalition

House Bill 1569

UIL Participation

An act relating to participation in school district services and activities by home-schooled students.

The following were also posted along with the site linked (above).

  • Home Education Magazine, May-June 2000, Why the Question of Homeschoolers’ Playing Public School Sports Affects All Homeschoolers
  • Home Education Magazine, November-December 1999, Convincing Others We Don’t Want Homeschooling Legislation

posted by Valerie

Tags: House Bill 1569, Texas Home School Coalition, Texas homeschool

Stories We Are Following

  • Common Core Standards
  • Romeike Family Asylum
  • Tebow Bills
  • Compulsory Attendance
  • Public School at Home
  • State Legislation
  • Alabama
  • Illinois
  • North Carolina
  • Tennessee
  • Texas

More News

  • State News
  • Federal News
  • International News
  • Reasons to Homeschool
  • Successful Homeschoolers
  • Politics
  • Sports

Resource Guide

Become a part of our Resource Guide

Art
  • Little Acorn Learning
Books
  • History Adventures
  • The New 3R's - Burns
Chemistry
  • Home Training Tools
Children's Magazines
  • Skipping Stones
Colleges
  • Central Christian College of the Bible
  • Evergreen State College
  • Bard College
  • Goddard College
  • Antioch University
  • Hampshire College
  • Hillsdale College
  • Prescott College
  • Reed College
  • St. John's College
  • University of CA at Berkeley
  • Brown University
  • MIT
  • No College!
  • Zero tuition College
Computer Science
  • Computer Programming for Kids
Conferences
  • Trailblazer Gathering
  • Life Rocks
  • Rethinking Everything
Educational Supplies
  • Lifetime Learning Companion
Family Vacations
  • Camp Common Ground
Foreign Language
  • Homeschool Spanish
  • Rosetta Stone
Games
  • Northstar Puzzle
Geography
  • USA Geography Quiz
History
  • History Resources
  • Lies My Teacher Told Me
  • Zinn Education Project
Home School Curriculum
  • The Keystone School
  • Oak Meadow
Literature
  • Literature Resources
Mathematics
  • Math Round Up
  • Sum Power Game
Music
  • Guitar Smith Online
  • Music on the Bookshelf
Online Programs
  • Free Audio - Video Stories
Online Schools
  • FLVS Global
  • Explorations Academy Online
Parenting Support
  • Touch the Future
Reading Instruction
  • The Reading Gym
Science
  • Hands on Science Kits
  • The Story of Cotton
  • Young Naturalist Awards
  • Weather For Kids
Self-Employment Education
  • Finding Your Niche
Summer Programs
  • Cornell University Summer College
Support Groups
  • State Laws
Testing/Assessments
  • SAT/ACT/AP Prep
Travel
  • Travel Ideas
Unschooling
  • unschoolers.org
  • Unschool Family Counseling
  • Unschooling
  • The Unschool Experiment
Writing Programs
  • Incite to Write

Become a part of our Resource Guide

  • Copyright © 2013
  • Go back to top ↑
Network - HEM
  • Log In
  • Blog Authors
    • HEM
    • Helen
    • Mark
    • marynix
    • ann-lahrson-fisher
    • valerie
    • sandi
    • monikab
    • jessicap
    • Susan
  • Visit
    • Random Member
    • Random Site
HEM Network, Home Education Magazine Digital 2012