What is going on?
Sep 6 2011 in Court Case by Helen
It is with a heavy heart and a troubled conscience that I undertake the writing of this perhaps long overdue post. It has never been my intention to lay bare the details of the lawsuit which was filed against me last year by cyberschool owner Mimi Rothschild, her husband Howard Mandel, and their business, Learning by Grace, but the time has come to respond to her unmitigated and outrageous claims, and to her increasingly threatening and damaging actions against me and many others.
In early 2010, Mimi Rothschild, Howard Mandel, and Learning by Grace filed their original lawsuit against Heather Idoni, a homeschooling mother and a widely respected businesswoman, who published a commentary in her newsletter which criticized the Rothschild-Mandels’ multiple interlinked cyberschools. I did not know Heather personally, but I was aware of her good reputation within the homeschooling community for truthful accuracy in her newsletter, and so, on August 13, 2010 I reported the lawsuit in Home Education Magazine’s news blog, expressing my opinions about Mimi’s business practices and tactics against people such as Heather.
In late fall, 2010 I received an email from Heather stating, in part, that she had received notice of a new filing by Mimi attempting an amended complaint to join me and Home Education Magazine to the lawsuit as defendants. Having been threatened with lawsuits by Mimi many times over the years, I did not take Heather’s warning seriously, primarily because at that time my attention was focused on my father’s failing health. To the best of my knowledge Mimi Rothschild have never followed through with her threats in the past, and I fully expected that she was once again merely playing a game of brinksmanship.
A few weeks later I was notified that Mimi Rothschild, Howard Mandel, and Learning by Grace had, indeed, filed to include me in their lawsuit against Heather Idoni. Turning to friends for advice, I secured attorney John McKay, of Anchorage, Alaska, who in turn made contact with an attorney in the filing state of Pennsylvania, Robert C. Clothier of Fox Rothschild LLP in Philadelphia. Our first step, over protests from Mimi Rothschild’s attorney, was to remove the lawsuit from the jurisdiction of the state of Pennsylvania to the U.S. Federal Court.
The following weeks and months were filled with emails, phone calls, updates, new filings, and all of the legal activities which accompany any lawsuit. What we were piecing together was the truth about what’s been said about Mimi. It still, to this day, jars my sensibilities to review the sheer outrageousness of this situation, and it only got worse the deeper we dug. The Rothschild-Mandels’ penchant for threatening lawsuits against anyone who crossed them had cowed everyone into submission and silence. No reasonable person wants legal action taken against them, and their noisy ongoing threats had allowed the Rothschild-Mandels to function more or less unchallenged for many years.
During the process of moving forward with the lawsuit, there were repeated attempts by Mimi Rothschild to contact and harass our witnesses, while requests for discovery documents were met with either inaction or submissions of thousands of pages of useless and unrelated documentation. Nevertheless, in July we received notice that the plaintiffs were interested in entering negotiations for a settlement, and we responded that we, too, were interested. So, after more exchanges of information and assurances that a settlement was sincerely being sought, my attorney and I traveled from Alaska to Pennsylvania; while Heather traveled from Michigan and her attorney, David Gibbs, came from Florida. The settlement conference was set for August 24, 2011, in the Federal courthouse in Philadelphia.
Long story short, the settlement discussions broke down when the plaintiffs sought the inclusion of a new demand, the removal of a blog post I’d written in 2008 which had never been part of the lawsuit. The day after we left Philadelphia the plaintiffS’ attorney filed a motion seeking leave to withdraw as plaintiff’s counsel, citing irreconcilable differences with his client.
Soon after that Mimi Rothschild began a vituperative series of blog posts railing against me, Heather, and whoever she thought might be connected, supporting, related to or in any way associated with us. The blisteringly written posts would escalate in shrillness and audacity over the next few days, and while she has clearly been editing them in afterthought, her posts are steadily escalating in outrageous rhetoric and unreasonable accusations.
Not content to write abusive posts about the defendants in the lawsuit she’d brought, on September 2 Mimi Rothschild placed a series of phone calls to the owner of the server on which the Home Education Magazine web site was hosted, abusing him verbally and threatening to involve him in the lawsuit unless the Home Education Magazine web site was removed from his server. Taken by surprise at the beginning of a holiday weekend, and shocked by the venomously intimidating threats, the server owner complied and our website was shut down.
Thankfully, we were able to move the Home Education Magazine website to a new server within a couple of hours. We are still resolving serious problems associated with the unexpected move, but the core of our site is running again. The whole incident was a distressing and eye-opening example of how far the plaintiff, Mimi Rothschild, would go in her efforts to compel compliance with her increasingly unreasonable demands. And, true to form, in her blog posts after the shutdown, Mimi has feigned innocence and surprise at the developments she orchestrated.
Mimi now claims that she has filed an antitrust claim alleging that the defendants engaged in a “group boycott” against plaintiffs. And on September 7 she announced that “Ann Zeise Under Investigation for Possible Conspiracy to Restrain Trade.” Many of our readers will recognize our friend Ann Zeise as the owner of one of homeschooling’s premier websites, A to Z Home’s Cool Homeschooling.
We do not know where this strange and unsettling case will go next, but we will keep our readers informed as it progresses. We appreciate your support, prayers, and good wishes for a fair and equitable resolution.
Helen Hegener, publisher
Home Education Magazine
http://homeedmag.com
Ann Zeise said on September 30, 2011
To date, I have not received any legal documentation from Mimi Rothschild or any lawyer on any matter whatsoever.
I supported Helen and Heather by providing an affidavit concerning how Mimi had used my personal name and website name for her own advertising purposes in Google Adwords and in another search engine. I also provided records of other well-known homeschoolers, websites, and organizations she had used as links to her own cyberschools. She even had the audacity of using “Home School Legal Defense” – leaving off the “Association” part, as if that would matter! If HSLDA decided to ignore Mim’s businesses after that, you better believe that they didn’t do it on the advice of any of us inclusive homeschoolers!
This is a form of identity theft. Wouldn’t you be upset if you searched in Google or Bing on your own name or business name, and saw a link in the right hand or top ads with your name linked…and going to one of Mimi’s cyberschools? Would you not want to warn your friends to check to see if it is happening to them, too?
Most of us in the world of homeschooling who have some sort of web business supporting homeschool families, are friendly competitors. We know we can only help so many homeschoolers within our own areas of expertise, so we enjoy working together to help everyone find a good educational fit for their kids and their family philosophies. We help families find good educational deals where they will get the excellence they expect, and try to steer them away from rip-offs, and those using shady business practices.
Pray that we can continue to guide families wanting the best in home education!
Ann Zeise
A to Z Home’s Cool
Adesa Hafford said on October 6, 2011
Mimi has been doing things like this for *decades*. I am sincerely grateful to you, Helen (and all the defendants), for standing up to her. This woman and her husband need to be stopped. I hope she’ll learn, in the process, that she is completely in the wrong and is a bully. Though I doubt it.
Helen said on October 16, 2011
Many friends are wondering about the lawsuit now that it’s coming to an end, and asking questions on discussion groups, Internet forums, blogs, and privately. Long story short, the good news is we won in every important aspect. The bad news is it was a philosophical and moral win, not a
material or financial one. It literally cost me everything I own and more; it cost my attorneys almost a year they could have been putting toward more important and constructive efforts; it cost my family
dearly… But we won.
I’ll share information about what happened during the hearings when I can, but I am not going to write anything about the lawsuit without my attorney’s approval, and we’re still working on the resolution details. I deeply appreciate your patience and understanding; it’s taken us almost a year to reach this point of resolution, a few more days won’t make much difference.
Here’s what I can share from PACER, the Public Access to Court Electronic Records:
Order of October 14:
“ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.”
My attorneys and I are still working on the agreement referenced above, so I can’t say anything about it.
Order of October 13:
AND NOW, this 12th day of October, 2011, following oral argument, it is ORDERED the Motion for Leave to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiffs filed by Richard Hans Maurer (Document 45) is GRANTED.
It is further ORDERED Defendant Heather Idoni’s Bill of Costs (Document 71) will be GRANTED. Plaintiff shall pay the bill of costs in the amount of $3,725.30 within ten days of this Order.
It is further ORDERED Defendant Helen Hegener’s Bill of Costs (Document 72) will be GRANTED. Plaintiff shall pay the bill of costs in the amount of $2,988.00 within ten days of this Order.
People have been asking if they could share this news. Yes, please feel free to share it anywhere, via discussion groups, forums, blogs, newsletters, anyplace where people who’ve been wondering about this lawsuit will find that it’s over and we’re moving on now. But there’s a little more I’d also like to have widely shared:
A friend wrote to ask about the costs involved; they’d heard that Mimi had to pay our attorney fees, but that is not so. The costs are enormous, almost a quarter of a million dollars now, and Mimi and her lawyer do NOT have to pay all our expenses. She will pay only my attorney’s costs and travel expenses from the Oct. 7th hearing Mimi didn’t attend, and they’re pretty minimal, under $3,000. Still, it’s an important victory in the sense that she’s paying us, and we are not paying her.
We did not receive any compensation for the loss of business from losing our web site and our ordering systems at the height of what is normally the best time of year for us. We not only lost the HEM site because of Mimi’s harassment, but ALL our other web sites, even those not related to homeschooling. But perhaps the biggest and potentially most significant loss was my ability to communicate in my normal manner and volume. I’ve had a long-running problem with carpal tunnel
syndrome, but I’ve kept the situation under control for many years by moderating the use of my hands. The extreme volume of typing with all the filing and emailing and communications which this lawsuit has necessitated has my hand almost crippled. I shouldn’t be typing this, but hopefully it will help get the word out that this is over, and we’re ready to set about the difficult task of rebuilding almost 30 years of work.
We need help. If you’ve ever considered becoming involved with this publication, please contact me at helenhegener@homeedmag.com and explain what you’d be interested in doing. If you have no idea but just like the idea of helping, I’ll be putting together a list of what we need and will post it at our HEM Networking discussion group on YahooGroups sometime in the next few days.
And if you can help financially, even a tiny little bit, you can send it via PayPal to orders@homeedmag.com or via check to Helen Hegener, PO Box 759, Palmer, Alaska 99645 (yes, that’s my personal address). I’m working on a ‘Friends of HEM’ web site, and I’ll share more on that soon.
Thank you, everyone, for your support,
Helen
Tanya Steinberg said on October 16, 2011
I don’t personally know Mimi, her husband, or either of the two defendants, Heather and Helen, involved in this case. I am however a subscriber to Home Education Magazine and happened upon this legal battle on Facebook. Naturally it tapped my curiosity and let me say the only one tarnishing Mimi and Learning by Grace’s reputation is HERSELF. Her inability to stop fueling the fire with frivolousness and rambling posts only provides more ammunition and further solidifies the accusations against (and peoples opinions of) her. And before Mimi jumps on the boat and claims I’m a homeschooling purist, Helen lover, or whatever other nonsense she dreams up I’ve been homeschooling for over 7 years and have homeschooled both traditionally and via a virtual academy (a point which Mimi repeatedly makes in regards to HEM’s apparent “attitude” towards virtual academies).
Ed said on October 16, 2011
Our family will be praying for you. This is the first we heard of it.
“But they that wait upon the LORD shall renew their strength; they shall mount up with wings as eagles; they shall run, and not be weary; and they shall walk, and not faint”. Isaiah 40:31 KJV